Earl Raab. former president of heavily Jewish Brandeis University makes the diversity argument in a slightly different way. Expressing his satisfaction with the prediction that by the middle of the next century whites will become a minority. he writes. “We have tipped beyond the point where .
A Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.” He is apparently prepared to displace the people and culture of the founding stock in order to prevent the theoretical rise of an anti-Jewish regime. Prof. Raab appears to see whites mainly as potential Nazis. And is willing to sacrifice their culture and national continuity in order to defuse an imagined threat to Jews.
In the same passage. Prof. Raab
Continues by noting that. “[w]e [Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected. But the hterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible.”Just as it tends to make the ultimate displacement of European culture also irreversible.
Prof. MacDonald traces the developement of this diversity strategy to several sources. It is widely recognized that the German-Jewish immigrant Franz Boas (1858-1942) almost single-handedly established the current contours of anthropology. ridding it of all biological. Explanations for differences in human culture or behavior. Prof. MacDonald reports that he and his followers . With the notable exceptions of Margaret Meade and Ruth Benedict – were all Jews with strong Jewish identities: “Jewish identification and the persuit of perceived Jewish interests. particularly in advocating an ideology of. Cultural pluralism as a model for Western societies. has been the ‘invisible subject’ of American anthropology.”
Boas and his students controlled the American
Anthropological Association and by 1926 job function email list they headed every major American university anthropology department. From this position of dominance they promoted the idea that race and biology are trivial matters. and that environment counts for everything. They completely recast anthropology so as to provide intellectual support for open immigration. integration. and miscegenation.
They also laid the foundation for the idea that jewish interests even though they were presented because all races have the same potential. the failures of non-whites must be blamed exclusively on white oppression. The ultimate conclusion of Boasian anthropology was that since environment accounts. For all human differences. every inequality in acheivement. Can be eliminated by changing the environment. This has been the justification for enormous and wasteful government intervention programs.
The entire “civil rights” movement can be seen
A natural consequence of the triumph of Boasian thinking. Since all races were equivalent. separation was immoral. The color line also sharpened white self-consciousness in ways that might make whites more aware of Jewish parochialism. Thus it was. according to Prof. MacDonald.
Therefore, That Jews almost single-handedly virgin islands mobile data launched the desegregation movement. Without the leadership of Jews. the NAACP might never have been established. and until 1975 every one of its presidents was a Jew. Prof. MacDonald reports that in 1917. When the black separatist. Marcus Garvey visited NAACP headquarters. he saw so many white faces that he stormed out. complaining that it was a white organization.